Why do I spend my time publishing things on my blog ? Since the beginning I can’t stop asking myself this question and I think that the main reason why I’m doing this is because it helps me understand what I do and where I am going.
I principally refers to my projects. For instance, since 2 years I’m working as curator and organizer of international workshops in Paris about computational design and parametric architecture. I know that I love to do that but I don’t understand why. Sometimes I can’t figure out what are the connections between different things I do.
The other day I was in Amsterdam with one of the participants of a past workshop and we havre been discussing for an hour about art, architecture, computation, life and cities. I understood then clearly that working as workshop curator means constantly meeting new interesting people coming from different countries and with different approaches and ideas. And it’s one of the reasons why I love it.
Continue reading We Workshop, an online platform for my events in Paris
Dans le cadre de mon cours Architecture Paramétrique et en occasion du workshop international DATA BODIES j’organise la conférence DATA OBSESSION avec Andrea Graziano, designer italien expert en computation et paramétricisime. La conférence se tiendra le 12 mai à 19h à l’École d’architecture de la ville et des territoires à Marne-la-Vallée qui est partenaire de cet événement.
Continue reading DATA OBSESSION : conférence de Andrea Graziano le 12 mai
There is big trend about parametric approach and computation in design and architecture. In the last months, I’ve repeatedly been involved in discussions about if it would be more exact to call what we do as designers “computational design” or “parametric design”. It is not a useful discussion, I have to say.
I have the feeling that computational design is more trendy and parametric design is more nineties, would you agree with that ? As Aldo from Noumena Architecture said during our last workshop : “Don’t say parametric design!”.
But what is the difference between “parametric design” and “computational design” ?
I don’t know. “Computational design” refers to the use of computers and mathematical approach to the generation of geometries, objects and architecture. “Parametric design” is about using parameters to design things. It means that if parameters changes, the result change. Regardless of which expression is the best, what interests me the most is the idea of focusing on design process instead of designed objects.
The process is everything (Mies would say that “God is in the process”) and that’s why I think that “parametric design” is still an interesting way to explain our approach. Parameters is about changing conditions and adaptability to user needs. We need to design process instead of objects.
François Roche recently published on his blog our emails exchanges about these topics. If you know him a bit, you would not be surprised to see that he’s not very polite. If you don’t speak French, try to google translate the post.
François Roche says that “computation is a good think, not parametric design…it’s like confusing science with the power of science”.
I answered “Personally, I’m more interested in action than language.” Continue reading Parametric VS Computational Design